Skip to main content
News
Bridging

Developers Risk £1m with Poor Lender Comparison in Bridging Finance

Developers risk losing over £1 million by failing to compare lenders for bridging finance, highlighting the importance of thorough lender evaluation.

By David Sampson
2 September 2026
3 min read
UK bridging mortgage article image for Developers Risk £1m with Poor Lender Comparison in Bridging Finance

TL;DR

  • Developers could lose over £1 million by not comparing lenders.
  • bridging finance offers vary widely, impacting project financing and returns.

Written by David Sampson for Mortgage118. Last updated 2 September 2026. Reviewed against our editorial standards. Editorial standards. Mortgage118 is a directory — not FCA-authorised and not a mortgage adviser.

Recent analysis highlights a significant risk for property developers who neglect to compare lenders when seeking bridging finance. Failing to explore multiple options can lead to substantial financial losses, with differences in loan offers reaching over £1 million in some cases. This situation underscores the importance of thorough lender comparison to secure the best possible financing terms.

How Much Can Developers Lose with Bridging Finance?

In a recent study, it was found that developers could face staggering differences in loan offers when seeking bridging finance, commercial mortgages, and development finance. For instance, a £3.7 million development project with a gross development value of £5.2 million saw offers varying by £842,000. Such discrepancies can drastically affect project viability and the overall return on investment.

What Are the Specific Differences in Bridging Finance Offers?

When examining bridging loans, the analysis revealed an average difference of £250,000 for a £1.4 million purchase. In the case of commercial mortgages, the gap was even larger, averaging £306,000 on a £1.5 million purchase. This indicates that developers who do not shop around could be leaving significant sums on the table, potentially affecting their ability to fund multiple projects.

What This Means for Investors and Landlords in Bridging Finance

For investors and landlords, the implications are clear. The ability to secure a larger loan can lead to a much higher return on capital employed. For example, on the same £3.7 million scheme, the most competitive lender offered £3,371,262, while the least competitive provided only £2,340,936—a difference of £1,030,326. This disparity means that with better financing terms, an investor could spread their capital across multiple projects, enhancing their potential for growth and diversification.

Why Is This Happening in Bridging Finance?

The tendency to rely on a single lender or a limited selection is common among borrowers and brokers, often due to a lack of access to technology that facilitates broader comparisons. This practice can lead to missed opportunities and financial inefficiencies, particularly in a competitive market where every pound counts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should developers do to avoid losing money on loans?

Developers should utilize technology and comparison platforms to evaluate multiple lenders and their offers. This approach can help identify the most competitive terms and potentially save hundreds of thousands of pounds.

How can I ensure I get the best bridging finance deal?

To secure the best bridging finance deal, compare offers from various lenders, focusing on the total loan amount, interest rates, and terms. Engaging with a mortgage broker who specializes in bridging finance can also provide valuable insights and options.

About David Sampson

David Sampson writes about the UK mortgage market for Mortgage118, covering specialist lending, market trends, and practical advice for borrowers. All content is reviewed for accuracy against FCA guidelines and current market data.