Skip to main content
News
Bridging

Developers Risk £1m by Not Comparing Bridging Finance Offers

Developers risk losing over £1 million by not comparing bridging finance offers, highlighting the importance of thorough lender comparisons.

By David Sampson
27 August 2026
3 min read
UK bridging mortgage article image for Developers Risk £1m by Not Comparing Bridging Finance Offers

TL;DR

  • Developers could lose out on over £1 million by not comparing bridging finance offers.
  • discrepancies in lender terms can lead to vast differences in funding options.

Written by David Sampson for Mortgage118. Last updated 27 August 2026. Reviewed against our editorial standards. Editorial standards. Mortgage118 is a directory — not FCA-authorised and not a mortgage adviser.

Recent analysis highlights a significant risk for developers who fail to compare bridging finance offers, potentially tying up over £1 million in unnecessary costs. The findings reveal substantial differences in loan offers across various lenders, emphasizing the importance of thorough comparisons in securing the best financial terms.

How Much Can Developers Save by Comparing Lenders?

According to a recent study, bridging loan searches showed an average difference of £250,000 on a £1.4 million purchase. In commercial mortgages, the difference averaged £306,000 on a £1.5 million purchase. The most striking disparity was found in development finance, where offers for a £3.7 million project varied by an astounding £842,000. This illustrates how critical it is for developers to shop around for the best rates, as the financial implications can be substantial.

What Are the Implications of Not Comparing Bridging Finance?

For a £1.4 million residential purchase in London, bridging finance offers ranged from £646,106 to £979,265, resulting in a £333,159 difference. The most competitive lender was willing to advance 52% more than the least competitive provider. In commercial mortgages, a £1.5 million retail purchase in the North West showed offers ranging from £750,000 to £1.125 million, a £375,000 difference that could significantly reduce the deposit required for borrowers. Such variations can drastically affect cash flow and investment strategies.

What This Means for Investors and Brokers

Investors and brokers must take these findings seriously. The ability to secure a larger facility can lead to a 94% higher return on capital employed, as demonstrated in the £3.7 million development scenario. The lowest deposit required was £450,000, compared to £1.4 million under less competitive terms. This means an investor with £1.4 million of equity could fund three projects instead of one, dramatically increasing their potential for profit. Over an investor’s career, this could translate into the ability to complete 30 projects instead of just 10.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is it important to compare bridging finance offers?

Comparing bridging finance offers is important as it can lead to significant savings, with differences in offers potentially exceeding £1 million. This can impact the overall profitability of property investments.

How can I effectively compare lenders for bridging finance?

Utilizing technology and comparison platforms can help streamline the process of comparing lenders, ensuring you secure the most competitive terms available in the market.

About David Sampson

David Sampson writes about the UK mortgage market for Mortgage118, covering specialist lending, market trends, and practical advice for borrowers. All content is reviewed for accuracy against FCA guidelines and current market data.