Skip to main content
News
Bridging

Developers Lose £1m by Not Comparing Bridging Finance Lenders

Developers risk losing over £1 million by not comparing bridging finance lenders, with average differences exceeding £842,000.

By David Sampson
30 August 2026
3 min read
UK bridging mortgage article image for Developers Lose £1m by Not Comparing Bridging Finance Lenders

TL;DR

  • Developers risk losing over £1 million by not comparing lenders for bridging finance.
  • the average difference in offers can exceed £842,000 across various scenarios.

Written by David Sampson for Mortgage118. Last updated 30 August 2026. Reviewed against our editorial standards. Editorial standards. Mortgage118 is a directory — not FCA-authorised and not a mortgage adviser.

Recent analysis reveals that developers could be missing out on significant savings by not thoroughly comparing bridging finance lenders. The study highlights that failing to shop around can lead to over £1 million being tied up unnecessarily in financing costs, impacting project viability and investment returns.

How Much Can Developers Save by Comparing Bridging Finance Offers?

The analysis conducted on 300 simulated searches for bridging loans, commercial mortgages, and development finance uncovered substantial discrepancies in lender offers. For instance, bridging loan searches on a £1.4 million purchase showed an average difference of £250,000. In the case of commercial mortgages, the gap averaged £306,000 for a £1.5 million purchase.

The most striking finding was in development finance, where offers for a £3.7 million project with a gross development value of £5.2 million varied by an astounding £842,000. Such differences highlight the necessity for developers to explore multiple lenders to secure the best possible terms.

What Are the Implications of Bridging Finance for Borrowers?

For borrowers, the implications of not comparing lenders are significant. For example, when considering a £1.4 million residential purchase in London, bridging finance offers ranged from £646,106 to £979,265, showcasing a £333,159 difference. This disparity means that the most competitive lender was willing to advance 52% more than the least competitive provider. Such variations can drastically affect the financial market for borrowers, influencing both upfront costs and long-term returns.

What This Means for Investors and Landlords in Bridging Finance

Investors and landlords must recognize the importance of diligent lender comparison. In a scenario involving a £3.7 million development, the lowest deposit required was £450,000, while the least competitive terms demanded £1.4 million. This means that an investor with £1.4 million of equity could potentially fund three projects under the more favorable terms rather than committing all funds to a single project. Over a career, this could translate to completing 30 projects instead of just 10, significantly enhancing portfolio growth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is comparing bridging finance lenders important?

Comparing lenders is important as it can reveal significant differences in loan offers, which can affect the overall cost of borrowing and project feasibility.

How can developers ensure they get the best deals?

Developers should utilize technology and comparison platforms to evaluate multiple lender offers, ensuring they secure the most competitive terms available.

About David Sampson

David Sampson writes about the UK mortgage market for Mortgage118, covering specialist lending, market trends, and practical advice for borrowers. All content is reviewed for accuracy against FCA guidelines and current market data.