Skip to main content
News
Bridging

Developers Face £1m Loss by Not Comparing Bridging Finance

Developers risk losing over £1 million by not comparing bridging finance lenders, with discrepancies averaging £842,000 on identical projects.

By David Sampson
27 August 2026
3 min read
UK bridging mortgage article image for Developers Face £1m Loss by Not Comparing Bridging Finance

TL;DR

  • Developers could lose out on over £1 million by not comparing lenders.
  • bridging finance searches showed discrepancies up to £842,000 on identical projects.

Written by David Sampson for Mortgage118. Last updated 27 August 2026. Reviewed against our editorial standards. Editorial standards. Mortgage118 is a directory — not FCA-authorised and not a mortgage adviser.

Developers are risking significant financial losses by not thoroughly comparing lenders for bridging finance options. An analysis of 300 simulated searches revealed that failing to explore multiple lending options could tie up over £1 million in unnecessary costs, impacting project viability and returns.

How Much Can Developers Save by Comparing Lenders?

According to recent findings, bridging loan searches for a £1.4 million purchase revealed an average difference of £250,000 among lenders. For commercial mortgages on a £1.5 million purchase, the gap was even wider, averaging £306,000. The most significant variance was noted in development finance, where offers for a £3.7 million project showed an average difference of £842,000. This discrepancy highlights the critical importance of comparing multiple lenders to ensure developers secure the best possible financing terms.

What Are the Implications of Not Comparing Bridging Finance?

For a residential purchase in London valued at £1.4 million, bridging finance offers varied significantly, ranging from £646,106 to £979,265. This £333,159 difference indicates that the most competitive lender was willing to offer 52% more than the least competitive provider. Such substantial differences can dramatically affect the financial market for developers, impacting their ability to fund projects effectively.

What This Means for Investors and Borrowers

The findings underscore a pressing need for investors and borrowers to use technology and comprehensive comparisons when seeking bridging finance. For instance, on a £3.7 million development scenario, the lowest deposit required was £450,000, while the least competitive terms demanded £1.4 million. This means that an investor with £1.4 million could potentially spread their capital across three projects instead of committing it all to one. Over time, this strategy could lead to completing 30 projects instead of just 10, significantly enhancing returns.

Why Is This a Wake-Up Call for Brokers?

The analysis reveals that many brokers and borrowers still rely on a limited number of lenders, which is a standard practice in the industry. Ian Humphreys, CEO of Brickflow, emphasizes that using technology to compare lenders is essential for maximizing financing opportunities. Brokers who fail to adapt may inadvertently restrict their clients’ options and financial outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I find the best bridging finance deals?

To find the best bridging finance deals, consider using comparison platforms that analyze multiple lenders’ offers. This will help you identify significant differences in terms and rates.

What should I consider when choosing a lender for bridging finance?

When choosing a lender for bridging finance, evaluate interest rates, fees, terms, and the lender’s reputation. Comparing multiple lenders can lead to better financial outcomes.

About David Sampson

David Sampson writes about the UK mortgage market for Mortgage118, covering specialist lending, market trends, and practical advice for borrowers. All content is reviewed for accuracy against FCA guidelines and current market data.